View Single Post
      01-23-2020, 04:50 PM   #6
limeypride
Brigadier General
limeypride's Avatar
United_States
4425
Rep
4,109
Posts

Drives: 2022 M8 Competition GC
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Orlando area, FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic55 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by limeypride View Post
What was the general conclusion that led you to comment the RS7 sucks?

I think I'm already sufficiently turned off with the performance data alone (but perhaps the Performance model will restore parity) but now it seems the tranny isn't up to snuff either?
Between this test and Auto Bild, the disparities in times thru the ranges are rather large. More than should be expected for a 600hp car vs the CE or the GT63S. The track times are even worse:

Auto Bild

https://f90.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1685628

0-200 km is 11.9 for the RS7 vs 10.3 for the BMW and 10.4 for the AMG. You can see the other measurements show disparities too.

Big disparities with Sport Auto as well (posted above)

0-200 is 12.4 for the RSy vs 10.5 for the BMW and 10.7 for the AMG.

Thats a big gap and gaps in other measures too. And I did say it sucks comparatively as it still is faster than so many cars out there. But these are its direct competitors along with the E63S.
at Audi. Why would they do this. Sigh.

Thanks for the insights/translation.
Appreciate 0