Quote:
Originally Posted by scoobysaurus
It looks more like an elevated wagon than an SUV. If they're gonna call it an SUV it should at least be able to perform decently off-road like the Range Rover.
|
As already noted above, they don't call it an SUV, technically. They call it an SAV.
But wait a minute. Why does it even matter what they call it, when the term SUV is routinely applied to most any type of SUV-like vehicle on the market?
https://www.autotrader.com/car-shopp...ference-215843
"The result is that the term 'SUV' is often applied to both crossovers and SUVs."
Quote:
|
Saying "well most owners never take it off-road anyway" is stupid because I don't see Land Rover becoming complacent for such silly reasons. If it's not meant to go off-road just call it a CUV, not an SUV. Just another bloated crossover wagon like the Infiniti JX/QX60, GMC Acadia and the Lincoln MKT. I'm seriously disappointed
|
Stupid? Really?
Yeah, either that or you could opt not to be nearly so pedantic, and we can end the discussion here rather than wandering needlessly and hopelessly off topic.
Can I get everyone to agree to that?