11-16-2014, 06:49 PM | #1 |
Chief Warrant Officer
1025
Rep 1,638
Posts |
E36 M3 Blasphemy?
So since we don't have much more to discuss right now beyond beating all the speculation to death, I'll take the opportunity to stir the pot a bit.
So back in 2003, I had a friend who had an E36 M3 (stock, I believe). I drove it (only once though, to be fair, and not on a track - just spirited driving on local roads). My impressions: a nice, fun little sporty car, but...meh. I had just bought a brand new Mazda RX-8 at the time, and I felt that the M3 had only marginally better acceleration (if you knew how to drive the RX-8, which was to keep in in the 5k-9k RPM band), and no better handling than my RX-8. Maybe it was the bias of my own purchase, but while I thought it was a good car, I didn't see what the big deal was, and still don't. I wasn't impressed with an M3 until the E46 version. So, I wonder what all the fuss is about the E36 M3, and why would we want the M2 to be its successor. I would rather the M2 be the mother f'in M2: the start of a whole new paradigm, not the continuing legacy of a car was good, but not earthshattering. Discuss. Last edited by Cavpilot2k; 11-16-2014 at 06:58 PM.. |
11-16-2014, 07:19 PM | #2 |
First Lieutenant
206
Rep 341
Posts |
I wouldn't harp on the idea of the M2 as a legacy car for too long. The 1M was originally compared to the E30 M3, the M235i had that adorable commercial with the 2002...
Modern cars are so different from their predecessors I always find these comparisons to be dubious. Now I'm just waiting for a new commercial for the F80 M3 to be called the new e34/9 M5. I don't think we've seen one of those yet lmao.
__________________
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S2
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2014, 09:21 PM | #3 |
Second Lieutenant
25
Rep 248
Posts |
What? How high are you?
The E36 M3 is awesome. It is easily one of the best cars out there, dollar for dollar against anything in the used market. Go drive one again. It is a benchmark sports car. ...Are we really having a conversation about a car you half-heartedly drove over a decade ago, 4 years after the last example of its generation was built? |
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2014, 09:35 PM | #4 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
991
Rep 1,914
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Past: 1999 M3 2003 M5 2006 330i 2007 335i 2009 M3 2013 M3 2018 M3
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2014, 10:24 PM | #5 |
Registered
0
Rep 4
Posts |
I currently own a E36 M3/4/5 which I love. I love the balance and handling of the car and how get get direct feel from the steering. Even with the U.S. Spec S52 it is still more than enough to get me introuble. I think people are relating the E36 M3 to the new M2 mostly based on size as the new M3/M4 are pretty big cars. I can't wait to add the M2 to my Old M3. I hope the M2 is just like my 98 M3, but more modern in every sense with out the size increase. Just my $.02
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 12:33 AM | #6 |
Second Lieutenant
95
Rep 273
Posts |
The e36 M3 was pure and unadulterated in comparison to the heavier chunkier e46 M3 which came with driving aids and and and...
It was a welterweight with a heavy weights punch lying in the front, thus making it quite the widowmaker on edge with an extremely tail happy nature. Had awesome balance and an amazing exhaust note to boot. It is and was a very natural car, well planted but could catch you unawares. Its just an experience to drive the e36 M3. Still got love for these cars. Comparison will come in by way of size and weight as well as we hoping for a similar fun factor with the new M2 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 07:53 AM | #8 |
Lieutenant General
7515
Rep 12,313
Posts |
I didn't know what the deal was about until I got mine. Was looking for a fun DD that had to be affordable. Was never in love with the E36 body style or anything, but it ticked all the boxes. Boy is it fun. On paper, it might not see like it much, but for $10k or so, I can't think of any other car I'd rather have. It's a bargain at that price, but the clean ones are hard to find nowadays. And even the US version has a smooth torquey I6.
It always gets hell for not having a "real" M engine, but if it did, I wouldn't have bought one. This thing is so simple to work on and is very reliable if you keep up with the maintenance. I can only hope the M2 is the same
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 08:59 AM | #9 |
Chief Warrant Officer
1025
Rep 1,638
Posts |
I think it would have made more of an impression on a track. Also, I am a much better performance driver now than I was 11 years ago, so I might notice its merits more if I were to drive it nowadays.
And I never said it was a crappy car - just in comparison to my RX-8 at the time I didn't see what the hoopla was about (but before you judge, you should have some experience with a 6MT RX-8 - it is a superb handler (the AT version was crap)). Anyway, I just wanted to start another discussion, since until something new and definitive comes out, the horse has been beaten to a pulp speculating about M2 specs and the MT vs. DCT nonsense. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 11:23 AM | #10 | |
Lieutenant General
7515
Rep 12,313
Posts |
Quote:
Never driven an RX8 before but I'm assuming you have to wind it out right? In daily driving situations, for an NA engine, this thing has some really good torque (nothing like your 135i of course). I guess the reason it's so good, and not just at the track, but as an everyday car is because it does everything so well, which IMHO the RX8 cannot. Having said that, the interior, especially the light grey ones don't age very well though. But the way these things have already bottomed out in price and have started steadily increasing makes for a pretty good ownership experience... granted mine is out of commission right now
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 11:33 AM | #11 | |
Chief Warrant Officer
1025
Rep 1,638
Posts |
Quote:
Re: E36: I had no idea they had gotten that inexpensive these days. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 11:45 AM | #12 | |
Lieutenant General
7515
Rep 12,313
Posts |
Quote:
The good thing about the E36 is that it has 240 ft-lbs of torque, but weighs a whopping 500 lbs-ish less than my E92, so it's pretty zippy in everyday driving. I've never thought geez, this car definitely needs more power, unlike when I test drove the BRZ. The prices on these are kind of all over the place. You can definitely get a higher mileage one for like $7k (these can be up to 19 year old cars by now). But my friend just sold his mint one for $16k (needed absolutely nothing, rare color combo ect...). Still, I think it's still a whole hell of a lot of car for money.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 12:05 PM | #13 |
Chief Warrant Officer
1025
Rep 1,638
Posts |
Nice.
Oh, another detail about the RX-8, and I only bring it up to put into context my comparison 11 years ago, was that it has standard a CF driveshaft (on the 6MT, anyway) and torsen LSD. I mention that so people unfamiliar with it don't write off the RX-8 as just some inexpensive upstart ricer. It was a very respectable car, performance-wise. So, the yardstick by which I was measuring the E36 M3 was a serious one. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 12:17 PM | #14 | |
Lieutenant General
7515
Rep 12,313
Posts |
Quote:
I was actually sad that they stopped making it. I've always been a huge fan of the RX7 too (in theory, not sure I'd want to deal with rotaties haha, got enough to deal with already!). Not that I'm a track guru or anything, but a properly setup E36 M3 will nip at the heels of an E46 M3 at the track. That's why they are still so popular today. At the end of the day though, I'm hoping the M2 is a worthy replacement for mine. P.S. Damn we need more spy shots again or something.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 12:22 PM | #15 |
Chief Warrant Officer
1025
Rep 1,638
Posts |
No kidding. I'm dying for more info.
On the plus side, that GT350 looks sexy as hell (a bit over-large for my taste, but beautiful and I bet it will be a truly worthy performer). Did you hear that exhaust at the end of the video? Sick! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 12:32 PM | #16 | |
Lieutenant General
7515
Rep 12,313
Posts |
Quote:
But like I said in my quick review of the Mustang, it's not for me. The car is HUGE. It seriously felt like the same size as a V10 M6 to me. I've already got a big V8 coupe (my E92), so I'm looking for something different. I would actually love a new interpretation of a Z3M, but the M2 is the closest thing to it at the moment. I'm more interested in adding something on the smaller size, that's more nimble and fun, rather than brute power like the Stringray and GT350. The thing sounds like an absolute monster though.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 01:17 PM | #17 | |
Chief Warrant Officer
1025
Rep 1,638
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 01:44 PM | #18 | |
Lieutenant General
7515
Rep 12,313
Posts |
Quote:
I'm not counting it out though, I think it's definitely worth checking out.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2014, 08:08 PM | #22 |
Second Lieutenant
31
Rep 214
Posts |
To some extent, I do agree with the OP's original sentiments of the e36M3. I had an e36 M3/4/5 for well over a decade as well. The 96+ e36 M3s are great daily drivers in that they have a lot of low end torque (relatively speaking in comparison to an Rx-8 or S2000, two cars that are constantly compared to it). However, as you mentioned, they do have relatively short power bands (redline at 6500RPM), and they also do run out of breath in the upper range. Due to this, a popular mod for these cars is the OBDI manifold from the 95 M3 that makes them breath better up top, while giving up some low-end power. Since most of your spirited driving/racing occurs in the upper range, and not the lower range, this was a good compromise. In this regard, cars like the RX-8 and S2000 could be considered way more fun due to the ability to wind it out well into the 8-9K rpm, as opposed to only 6500 in the e36 M3. All these three cars had comparable straight line speed, but the e36M3 weighs a few hundred lbs more than the Rx-8 and S2000 (and this shows in the handling dept where the RX-8/S2000 gives the e36M3 plenty of fits). The e36M3 was also considered a slight departure of the typical M cars with higher rev limits, individual throttle bodies, distinct body kits from their normal versions, etc. However, this did present it's advantages as well in that the e36M3 was relatively easy to maintain (no valve adjustments, no rod bearing issues, etc) that are present in the other "typical" M cars. The e36M3 was almost as easy/cheap to maintain as a 328i.
All in all, the e36M3 is a great car, and for the price that they can be had now, they would be great, inexpensive, and fun weekend/track cars. Just make sure all of the typical "maintenance" items have been addressed on the higher mileage ones (cooling system overhaul, power steering hoses, suspension (RTABs/LCABs/RSMs), etc). |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|