|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
MPG Increase!
|
|
04-06-2010, 02:42 PM | #1 |
Modder Raider
758
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
MPG Increase!
I think that the Methanol Injection is really working with my MPG increase.
I used to get an average of 20 mpg between driving madly on the street and cruising on the freeway, but 6 months ago it seemed that I couldn't get any higher than 16.5 MPG combined. Now I am back up to 19.6 MPG. I added a catch can a while back to help with the oil blow by but the catch can was going to do nothing with all of the oil that already bypassed the system. I tried the sea foam which helped a bit but that can only do so much. I was seriously thinking of taking off the manifold and cleaning the valves, but it seemed so much easier to add meth. And, meth is a lot more fun. I added the Snow Performance stage 2 a while back and although people said to start spraying at 8+ psi, I wanted the meth to come on more frequently and a little sooner for cleaning purposes. So, I started the spray at 5 psi, and I believe it's working. The way the stage 2 works, there is a starting point and a 100% point, so my starting is 5 psi and my 100% is 8 psi. I really think that the Meth is helping. Has anyone else shown an improvement with their MPG after adding meth?
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
04-06-2010, 03:15 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
95
Rep 1,659
Posts |
well i guess it makes sense - if you are running a flash tune, when you start spraying meth the afr is richened by the additional fuel, therefore the ecu is able to reduce the amount of fuel required to maintain said afr....
i think? |
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2010, 03:47 PM | #4 | ||
Modder Raider
758
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
The meth did not clean my intake valves over night. It took about 4 months. Quote:
I don't give a crap abut that. I'm more concerned about a cleaner running more efficient running engine.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2010, 03:57 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant Colonel
131
Rep 1,629
Posts |
What's are tank? ~18 gallons? Say hypothetically you go through a gallon of meth per tank.
Methanol: 62,800btu per gallon Gasoline: 125,000btu per gallon Over one tank of gas, you meth will add about 3489btu of fuel value to each gallon of gasoline, or ~2.8%. Thus your 19.6 is really more like 19.05, meaning that your cleaner valves are responsible for a ~15% improvement in fuel economy ceteris paribus
__________________
Cars>Women
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2010, 04:03 PM | #6 | |
Modder Raider
758
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
Cruising MPG has gone up and that's when meth is not spraying so it shows that the cleaner valves are helping.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 03:35 AM | #7 |
Colonel
325
Rep 2,663
Posts
Drives: BMW 335xi Sedan; BMW M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
|
So Running meth cleans valves better than the sea foam?
__________________
335xi Sedan 6AT | Weather(70-85°F) | N54 Tune Comparison Chart || N54 Turbo Upgrade Comparison Chart
-PROcede Rev. 2.5 ~ v5 (3/17 maps) / JB4 (8/21 maps) / COBB (Stg2+FMIC LT Aggressive maps) †Procede Map2(UT 45 - IGN 40) Aggression Target 2.0 | 0-60 in 4.0sec || †Cobb E30 LT (35% Ethanol/65% 93 Octane) | 0-60 in 3.9sec AR Design Catless DP | BMS DCI + OCC | ETS 5 FMIC | Alpina B3 Trans Flash |235/265 19" Michelin PSS |
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 03:50 AM | #8 |
Brigadier General
314
Rep 3,262
Posts |
I think you just got bored of flooring your car
Seriously, I was hoping for a mpg increase with methanol too, but I am really afraid of the long-term implications on engine corrosiveness. Also, changing oil more often (as required with methanol) offsets the mpg increase (in fact, it costs more).
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 04:25 AM | #9 | |
Colonel
263
Rep 2,563
Posts |
Quote:
Alpina_B3_Lux
__________________
Audi R8 LMX, BMW M550i xDrive (G30 LCI); gone: Alpina B3 3,3 (E46), BMW 335i, Audi R8 V10 manual, Audi R8 V10, BMW M235i, BMW 550i F10
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 08:23 AM | #10 |
Colonel
142
Rep 2,661
Posts |
I do no more then 280 miles to the tank and usually get 260 miles on a tank tho. If you do the math 280= is almost 19 mpg and 260=~17 I drive pretty fast so that's not bad, but I do try to hold myself back from slamming the petal.
On the highway its a different story. I switch on the cruise control and activate the economy mode on the procede and I see 30s as far as meth goes i think i spend more gas cuz i have to punch it to spray it, which i try to avoid in my MT stage 4+ 335i (thats so hard not to do) if you are really saving gas then you probably wasting more methanol which is more $$$ theory: car senses more fuel and holds back on the gas i guess
__________________
Last edited by lamia2super; 04-07-2010 at 08:28 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 08:49 AM | #11 | |
Modder Raider
758
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
As i said already, my cruising MPG has gone up and when I am cruising, the meth is not spraying. How can I be wasting methanol and using less gas when the meth isn't even spraying?? Remember that I had this kit on my car for 4 months and I am finally seeing some results.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 08:57 AM | #12 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
95
Rep 1,659
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 10:04 AM | #13 |
Major
56
Rep 1,311
Posts |
Most certainly. Sea foam will not remove hard carbon by a quick and simple treatment. This is only possible with something that penetrates the valves for an extended period. If you ever have tried to remove carbon from valves you know it is very hard to remove, and not something that is possible to do by a quick treatment with sea foam or similar products.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 01:06 PM | #15 | |
Modder Raider
758
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 02:33 PM | #16 | |
Colonel
142
Rep 2,661
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 03:38 PM | #19 |
Brigadier General
198
Rep 4,647
Posts |
just a thought... if i take one of the dci off and run some steam water (i mean mist) while my car is sitting in garage at idle, do you think that will cause any problem as far as cleaning valve?
__________________
SGE92TT......................... 12.331 Sec @ 117.89 Mph............................POWERED BY
l BMS DCI l HELIX IC l FORGE DVs l RR OCC & CP & SCOOPS l AR 3" DPs l AE QUADs l BLISTEIN PSS10 l P3 VENT GUAGE l VISHNU PROCEDE V5 AUTOTUNE l Lots of Window Stickers |
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 04:53 PM | #20 | |
Modder Raider
758
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
The best way to do it is WOT.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 09:38 PM | #21 |
Major
56
Rep 1,311
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2010, 10:21 PM | #22 | |
Brigadier General
198
Rep 4,647
Posts |
Quote:
why?
__________________
SGE92TT......................... 12.331 Sec @ 117.89 Mph............................POWERED BY
l BMS DCI l HELIX IC l FORGE DVs l RR OCC & CP & SCOOPS l AR 3" DPs l AE QUADs l BLISTEIN PSS10 l P3 VENT GUAGE l VISHNU PROCEDE V5 AUTOTUNE l Lots of Window Stickers |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|