[mpop302]

     Featured on BIMMERPOST.com

I can’t seem to find accurate numbers for cargo volume behind 3rd row. Anyone have any idea? I find it surprising there’s over 90 cu ft with all rows down.. that’s quite a number not far off from trucks much larger on the exterior

[like2short]

Originally Posted by mpop302

I can’t seem to find accurate numbers for cargo volume behind 3rd row. Anyone have any idea? I find it surprising there’s over 90 cu ft with all rows down.. that’s quite a number not far off from trucks much larger on the exterior

Originally Posted by mpop302

I can't seem to find accurate numbers for cargo volume behind 3rd row. Anyone have any idea? I find it surprising there's over 90 cu ft with all rows down.. that's quite a number not far off from trucks much larger on the exterior

It depends on how it's measured.

In the euro method of measuring

It's 326L, 750L and 2120 L

That's 11.5, 26.5 and 74.9 cubic feet

But using the US SAE standard

48.6 behind row 2, 90.4 behind row 1. I could not find the sae number behind row 3, but I "estimate" it is around 15 cu feet on the sae standard.

If you need the entire row 3 and carry a bunch of stuff a van or a long wheel base GM or Ford SUV would work better.

[bde469]

Aren’t all of them in the US now measured including the foot space, ie underneath the seats when folded down which is not always useful space?

[like2short]

Originally Posted by bde469

Aren’t all of them in the US now measured including the foot space, ie underneath the seats when folded down which is not always useful space?

Maybe that's why the US #s are larger than the specs from the European press release