06-13-2016, 04:47 PM | #67 |
Lieutenant
103
Rep 443
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 04:48 PM | #68 | |
Captain
557
Rep 762
Posts |
If you read the test on sachenring, they dyno the GTS, its a bit under 500hp!
It might be a mistake from your part, as you say 4 seconds?! Thats a lifetime! Its 4 tenths, thats less than 0,5 seconds, and yes that much faster I agree. Becuse after 20 laps a solid driver would be far, far in front. Still 137kg is Killing time on track. Please understand that if you load the 991 GT3 with 137kg pork it would be slower than GTS as it only 0,4 sec faster when 137kg less than GTS. There is One reason they have penalty pork kg in racing, its to slow cars down! As a matter of fact, last track event I was on had F1 driver Markus Ericsson join us. He spoke alot o how pork effect a car on track. Turbo got awd, that is not same same as rwd cars. As well I just look up that turbo s in sport auto test, its 1595kg, thats same same as GTS. Still turbo s is 750nm and 560hp, dunlop sport maxx tire. Please see sport auto app, all data right there. The time 1.08,7 is turbo s! Please see GTS test on here, its same kg, like 1591kg or something?! Quote:
Last edited by Captain Unknown GT4; 06-13-2016 at 05:01 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 04:54 PM | #69 |
Major General
1718
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Yes, I discussed the 2s difference in lap time between the GT3 and Carrera S a few posts back
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 05:00 PM | #70 |
Banned
202
Rep 621
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 05:02 PM | #71 | |
Banned
202
Rep 621
Posts |
Quote:
I also was taking about the regular turbo which only has 520 hp. A turbo S is even faster. 1:08.7 is the base turbo. Turbo S was 1:08.5. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 05:04 PM | #73 |
Lieutenant
103
Rep 443
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
|
06-13-2016, 05:08 PM | #74 | |
Captain
557
Rep 762
Posts |
The time 1.08,7 is from 1595kg full of fuel turbo s, its on 560hp and 750nm dunlop sport max. See sport auto app. Not to strange its fast car
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 05:09 PM | #75 | |
Major General
1718
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
M4: 7:52 Carrera S: 7:44 Carrera S: 7:34 (updated version with turbo and much better tires) So, the same gen M4 vs Carrera was 8s apart. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 05:12 PM | #76 | ||
Major General
1718
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 05:19 PM | #77 |
Lieutenant
103
Rep 443
Posts |
Yeah- makes sense except I think M4 CP will compare better with 991.1 Carrera S and base Carrera with base M4. The sport auto times for M4 CP will probably be closer to 991.1 Carrera S as new 991.2 S is close to 991 GT3 laptimes.
|
Appreciate
1
|
06-13-2016, 05:20 PM | #78 | |
Captain
371
Rep 769
Posts |
Amazing result.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 05:21 PM | #79 |
Lieutenant
103
Rep 443
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 05:22 PM | #80 | |
Brigadier General
3821
Rep 4,660
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Quote:
These types of cars, you're largely buying for two things: track work and badge. When comparing it to the GT3, there's nothing negative you can say about the GTS other than it doesn't have the prancing stallion. |
|
Appreciate
3
|
06-13-2016, 05:57 PM | #81 | ||
Colonel
352
Rep 2,176
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 06:46 PM | #82 |
Banned
202
Rep 621
Posts |
While I didn't go into as much detail I did say exactly this. Plus when you account for tires, that would be an even better time on pilot cup 2s than it already is.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 07:17 PM | #83 |
Lieutenant
447
Rep 429
Posts |
Gee, I wonder what car BMW used as a performance benchmark. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I still love the GT3. Sounds solo good.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 07:24 PM | #84 |
Colonel
1390
Rep 2,336
Posts |
Sure is. Understanding/accepting you may not be the best, but striving for it is very admirable. Never has BMW M claimed GTS to be "better" than the GT3. Leave that to this forum
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 08:01 PM | #85 | |
Major General
3221
Rep 6,218
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 08:45 PM | #86 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
1751
Rep 1,689
Posts |
Quote:
Like this new render... |
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 11:49 PM | #87 |
Major General
2751
Rep 6,759
Posts |
There are many variables here: driver, suspension setup, tire condition etc. in my view, for what are absolutely positively NOT race cars, 0.4 sec difference means nothing. I would say the same thing even if the 0.4 sec advantage were reversed.
These cars are meant for people like us, who almost never extract the full potential in a car. They are meant for track days, 20-30 min sessions followed by tall tales at the lunch break. Driver confidence and skill account for many *seconds* or *tens of seconds* - don't act as if that's not the case. What I am saying is that if you show up in one of these cars hoping to destroy someone in the other car, you might go home deflated. Buy whichever speaks to you and enjoy in good health. Stop bickering about petty differences and bullshit nuances.
__________________
2018 F80 Santorini 2019 Z4 3.0i 2022 X2 M35i |
Appreciate
1
|
06-14-2016, 12:50 AM | #88 |
Captain
557
Rep 762
Posts |
Yes, so what, that car has 580hp, still same same pork as Gts, even this turbo s is 1616kg. Still thats more or less same as Gts 1591kg.
We all know there are 2 turbo s times on list, 560hp and 580hp, it 1.08.7 and 1.08.5.....but some One here try to state thats a 520hp car, when its far from that. As well someone here try to make it out like porker was much more heavy-when it not. 560hp turbo s is same kg as Gts, 580 HP turbo s is a few more kg as it 1616kg thats it. No One find it strange this turbo s is faster than most cars on hockenheim! Not to strang on 750nm 560/580hp awd same weight as the lower power rwd M4 GTS. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|