|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
3" exhaust?
|
|
03-24-2008, 12:26 AM | #1 |
Private First Class
2
Rep 177
Posts |
3" exhaust?
are any exhausts being made full 3"? with no cats? as well as true 3" downpipes with no cats? i live in nebraska and lets just say we dont know what emission laws even are in this state. Just wondering if anyone can help.
|
03-24-2008, 12:34 AM | #2 |
اوليسيس
198
Rep 4,678
Posts |
contact VIP Tuning, i think they said it was 3.5 though.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:37 AM | #4 |
اوليسيس
198
Rep 4,678
Posts |
tell them that.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:40 AM | #6 |
اوليسيس
198
Rep 4,678
Posts |
i was being sarcastic.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:42 AM | #8 |
اوليسيس
198
Rep 4,678
Posts |
most are 2.5", that i have seen.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:48 AM | #10 |
Brigadier General
118
Rep 3,432
Posts |
anything more than 2.5'' is overkill unless you have turbo upgrade. 335i use dual exhaust so obviously 3'' is not just 3'' like on Evo's/Sti's which use single turbo and single exhaust...
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 12:53 AM | #12 |
اوليسيس
198
Rep 4,678
Posts |
also, if your intentions are based on downpipes, all the ones currently available taper to 2.5", unless you go custom of course.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 02:59 AM | #14 |
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep 778
Posts |
Any tapering in the early stages such as in the DPs is bad. However, since also 2.5" flows enough, it doesn't matter much. There is nothing wrong with 3". It fits. Go with 3", but you need to have it custom made.
The reason of the DPs tapering down to 2.5" is that the stock DP tapers down and DP manufacturers wnat their products to fit to all the catbacks in the market. However, Riss Racing has told they were considering having full 3" if there were demand enough. However, having all the catbacks smaller diameter to be fitted to the tapered DPs, adn therefor having all the DPs tapered, I think there is a circle that the catbacks and DPs have used to meet at the de facto standard diameter initiated by the original stock system. You would need to go full custom, which is a good alterative anyway, since you can select whatever sound and configuration you prefer. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 04:01 PM | #16 |
born to be turbocharged
24
Rep 1,347
Posts |
there were tests about a year ago with 3" dual setups. Results:
1. absolute overkill for stock turbos 2. serious fitment issues, there is not enough space for 3" dual systems under the car 3. because of 2. there is not much possibility to play with exhaust geometry so it droned like crazy 4. it was loud like hell but I suppose this fact won't bother some of U. Still want one? PS: the VIP 3.5" is a single pipe conversion prototype setup.
__________________
Disclaimer: All this message was written with recycled electrons.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 04:46 PM | #18 | |
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep 778
Posts |
Quote:
The testing does not sound very reliable because first they stated that there is not enough space and however, they were able to install it... Regarding the noise issues, it depends on the mufflers, resonators and catalysators used - not that much wether the diameter is 2.5 vs 3 inches. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 05:13 PM | #19 | |
Corporate Hack
4
Rep 288
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
New Car: 2008 335xi Coupe
Earlier Car: 2004 STi (got stolen) Earlier Earlier Car: 1995 Mustang GT (416 whp and a blown engine) Really Much Earlier Car: 1988 Mazda 626 TURBO |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 05:20 PM | #20 | |
born to be turbocharged
24
Rep 1,347
Posts |
Quote:
If I say there is not enough space, there is possibly not enough space to fit it confortably or fit it w/o touching the chassis or each other and plenty other reasons. But they were able to install it, test it, then throw it away - that's what U will possibly end up doing too, but just keep going on, a first hand experience is always better. And regarding the noice issues - U are right, but not 100% - first of all I dont think U intend to use cats (or even resonators), second there will be possibly no place to put resonators in reasonable places, third the mufflers are not a universal cure. Especially if U intend to put on 3" exhaust for performance purposes (unsubstantiated) it would be stupid to apply restrictive components to deaden sound and drone. A high-perf flow-through muffler wont help much.
__________________
Disclaimer: All this message was written with recycled electrons.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 05:39 PM | #21 |
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep 778
Posts |
I have had multiple turbo cars with one big 3" muffler at the very end of the exhaust. 3" mufflers flow so well that you don't need to skimp on their muffling abilities. The sound has been reasonable. Now having 2 small turbos instead of 1 big one silences the sound to begin with, and doubling the number of mufflers I would guess we end up with a BMW quality sound level - i.e. not too loud. You are right, I think I should try it out myself.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2008, 05:51 PM | #22 |
Brigadier General
118
Rep 3,432
Posts |
2.5'' is definitely enough w/o a doubt. Just think how those Evo's/Sti's have one much bigger turbo and 3'' is good enough for them, and now we have two much smaller turbos and 2.5'' exhaust coming out from each of them.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|