09-01-2017, 06:08 PM | #1 |
Major General
5865
Rep 6,637
Posts |
Hot days and stock M2
Usually in the Northern California Bay area it's not very warm. Usually 60s and 70s. Today it was over a 100 and wow did I notice a big difference in performance when driving in the afternoon! Car didn't feel like it pulled very hard at all. Still sounded good though!
Guess I better not move to Texas or Arizona, or if I do I should upgrade the intercooler! |
09-01-2017, 06:22 PM | #4 |
First Lieutenant
116
Rep 306
Posts
Drives: MY17 LBB M2
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pasadena
|
So Cal is on fire right now. Feels like you're in an oven.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-01-2017, 08:00 PM | #5 | |
Private
35
Rep 55
Posts |
Quote:
823 Hot Climate Version Heissland-ausfuehrung Don't know what's that. I am in Texas. Edited: found this by googling it. See the last post on this thread: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=690543 Last edited by M2018; 09-01-2017 at 08:10 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-02-2017, 02:14 AM | #7 |
Captain
1171
Rep 709
Posts |
I think cars destined for Texas have an exhaust outlet on the roof....
__________________
2011 Lotus Elise SC, 2002 BMW 330d, 1990 Caterham Super 7 HPC (sold), 1985 Porsche 911 Carrera SC (sold), 1978 Caterham Super 7 (sold), 1972 Triumph TR6 (sold), 1972 Jensen Healey (sold), 1965 Triumph TR4A (sold)
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-02-2017, 09:05 AM | #8 | ||
S0THPAW
8723
Rep 7,847
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Cheers Robin |
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-02-2017, 05:08 PM | #9 |
Private First Class
158
Rep 139
Posts
Drives: 2017 F87 M2
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Laguna Beach, CA
|
Which is why we live here
Now if we could just get rid of all the damn traffic on 133
__________________
|2017 LBB M2|6 speed|EP|DINAN Suspension|DINAN Free Flow Exhaust|DINAN Carbon CAI|DINAN Sport Tuner Stg 1|12/10mm MACHT SCHNELL Spacers|BMS Clutch Stop|IND Painted reflectors|ACEXXON/IND Rear Reflectors
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 12:20 AM | #10 |
Brigadier General
1622
Rep 3,402
Posts |
I live in AZ, I have driven my car in all temps between 28 degrees and 119. I have only noticed diminished performance when the heat is over 110-112 and I have been driving really hard for a good 45 mins or so. On a 119 degree day with a short drive I expected immediate issues but didn't , that day I wasn't out for long so I am sure it was just a matter of time. Fact is any car will perform better on a cool day than a hot day but I think some of the discussion about heat soak on the M2 are a little blow out of perspective at least from my experience. I have not tracked my car during one of these hot days so I am sure the folks that do track on 100 plus days are experiencing some heat soak, physics is a bitch.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 03:07 AM | #11 | |
Major General
5865
Rep 6,637
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 04:49 AM | #12 |
First Lieutenant
115
Rep 324
Posts |
Went to the beach 3 days a go, it was 44*c= 111 fahrenheit and the car was parked there under the sun for more than 10 hours, after first star i had something like " pedestrian detector" and " proximity radar" faults, second start, same thing....... run up thinking it would cool down and go away and i was right. After 15 min i stopped restarted the car and nothing displayed
I have one question for who knows: are the cooling fans motors in the engine bay " brushless " ? |
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 05:42 AM | #13 | ||
Colonel
863
Rep 2,897
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 02:57 PM | #14 | |
Major
1195
Rep 1,086
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
Glounk115.00 |
09-05-2017, 09:02 PM | #15 |
Major General
5559
Rep 5,374
Posts |
There's definitely more lag in hotter temps. It's because there's less readily available oxygen. Same goes for altitude; more lag. There's no getting around it in a turbo car.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2017, 12:42 PM | #16 | |
Second Lieutenant
126
Rep 255
Posts |
Quote:
I don't know about the "less oxygen content" thing. I didn't think heat or altitude changed the actual chemical composition of "air" - just fewer molecules of air in a given fixed volume - right?. Regarding altitude - my experience in driving various cars to high altitudes is that my NA cars got wimpier the thinner the air got (was very noticeable in my E60 M5)- but turbos stay the same (my m235i seems unfazed by altitude). This made sense to me cuz I assumed that thinner air in a NA car produced a poorer fuel/air mixture. But with a turbo, you aren't relying on mother nature for your air density - the turbo is cramming compressed air down the engine's throat - and so the thinner air at high altitude gets compressed to the proper density for a proper fuel/air mixture - yielding equivalent performance. Is my thinking just plain wrong on this? Or .... maybe I'm misinterpreting your comment. The OP was talking about poorer performance. I think maybe you're not saying the performance is degraded - you're just saying the lag-time (the time before peak turbo-induced performance is available) is longer (??). I guess that might make sense - takes longer to get air compressed to optimal density when the air is less dense to begin with. Apologies for thinking out loud here - but I am curious now to know if my understanding is even close to reality. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2017, 03:02 PM | #17 |
Major General
5559
Rep 5,374
Posts |
There's less oxygen in hot air because atoms are further a part for the same volume of air. Same thing goes for altitude, the air is less dense with oxygen because there's less atmospheric pressure.
Naturally aspirated motors are greatly affected by hot temps and/or altitude. Throw humidity into the mix and things get even worse for power production. Turbo motors are affected as well, but not nearly as much (about 30% compared to an NA motor). The reason turbos don't suffer as much is because the ECU allows for more boost to be created to meet the demanded torque target (i.e., full power), thus cram more oxygen into the motor. For example, on a crisp 40 degree day, your M2 may only make 12psi to meet the demanded torque target. On a 30 degree day max boost could be as low as 10psi to meet targets. On a 100 degree day, it may require 14-15psi. Although the peak hp and tq would measure the same assuming the motor isn't heat soaked, you'd feel that there is more turbo lag in hot temps and/or altitude. There's no getting around that. On colder days, the turbo motor will feel a lot snappier and responsive, especially in the low to mid range. Lastly and somewhat related, the M2 can suffer from heat soak. This is largely because it's a factory modified N55 pushing 10% more power over the M235's N55 all while running the same intercooler and cooling system minus some minor oil cooling improvements. The M235 is already susceptible to heat soak and the M2's extra power doesn't help things. If the motor is heat soaked and air intake temps are ultra high (i.e., 120+), the ECU will start pulling timing and boost to keep detonation at bay. An M2 can loose a decent amount of power when it's heat soaked and there are a few dynos floating around showing this very thing. Auto reviews have also noted how much stronger the M2 feels when it's being run in cooler temps and not heat soaked. Last edited by XutvJet; 09-06-2017 at 03:10 PM.. |
09-06-2017, 03:42 PM | #18 | |
First Lieutenant
345
Rep 340
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
Glounk115.00 |
09-06-2017, 04:19 PM | #19 |
Major
1195
Rep 1,086
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|