04-19-2018, 11:10 AM | #1 |
Major
509
Rep 1,345
Posts
Drives: 04 Z4, 18 X3 M40i
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ottawa and Collelongo (AQ) Italy
|
IIHS Crash Test and Rating
Seems that the collective wisdom that the full suite of safety features should be standard was adopted by the IIHS. Glad I got them all. Now to decode the anti-dazzle high beams...
https://www.thecarconnection.com/new...s-with-caveats |
04-19-2018, 12:32 PM | #2 | |
Major
406
Rep 1,348
Posts |
I'm wondering why IIHS is saying you need the Driving Assistance Plus Package, since it says you just need the optional Frontal Collision Warning with Extended Collision Mitigation.
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/veh...-door-suv/2018 According to this article about it, you only need the regular Driving Assistance Package since Frontal Collision Warning w/City Collision Mitigation works up to the 25 mph test limit. http://www.nydailynews.com/autos/new...icle-1.3941284 Quote:
__________________
21 BMW X5 xDrive40i
20 BMW M2 CS 19 Mini Cooper S Countryman ALL4 6MT |
|
Appreciate
1
TxHornX3M40iGuy128.50 |
04-19-2018, 03:05 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant
468
Rep 517
Posts |
Knew the Iconic Adaptive LEDs would get the highest headlight rating! It was the same case with the newest 5-Series; Iconic headlights got a Good rating while the regular LEDs were barely better than some halogens.
More reason folks should highly consider the Executive package! |
Appreciate
1
fxoffroad38.50 |
04-19-2018, 05:08 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant
468
Rep 517
Posts |
Kinda great to see that the BMW X3 is now the highest-rated vehicle in the Midsize Luxury SUV category from the IIHS! Even better is how it beat out the new Audi Q5 and Volvo XC60 For overall safety.
__________________
2023 BMW M340i xDrive
2020 BMW 330i xDrive 2018 BMW X3 xDrive30i |
Appreciate
1
fxoffroad38.50 |
04-21-2018, 11:49 AM | #5 |
Colonel
800
Rep 2,599
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2018, 12:37 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
468
Rep 517
Posts |
Well, the Macan hasn't been tested by the IIHS, so it's not ranked.
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/v/c...ze-luxury-suvs You could infer results that since the Macan was built on the old Volkswagen MLB platform, that the previous-generation Q5's results show a good glimpse into the Macan's potential crashworthiness. With Q5s built after January 2015, it got a Good overall rating on moderate overlap, small driver-side overlap, and side impact; however if you read into the results, it actually got an Acceptable for structural integrity rating in the small overlap test. The new Q5 built on the MLB Evo platform has the same issue: Good overall rating for small driver-side overlap crash, but technically an Acceptable rating for structural integrity. The G01 X3 gets a Good rating for each category AND each metric within each category. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|