|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Just curious to know your thoughts on this turbo.
|
|
01-21-2009, 11:26 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
148
Rep 1,738
Posts |
Just curious to know your thoughts on this turbo.
As many of you know we have been working on a turbo solution for the 335i. One of the set-up being discussed was a rear turbo set up. Like this one:
This would probably be the easiest turbo upgrade to do and therefore, the cheapest. It is very common with the American car market but not so common with European cars. Just wanted to get your thoughts on this. -Vince |
01-21-2009, 11:27 AM | #2 |
Bad cop no donut
9
Rep 266
Posts |
This would work on the non-turbo 3-series.
__________________
AW E90 M3... Cold, Premium, Tech, Silver Novillo, Carbon leather, ipod, EPS, Rear shade.... |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 11:37 AM | #3 |
Modder Raider
753
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
I've seen this on an e60 M5. It had twin turbos like this configuration.
When I see this, I see tons of lag!! The piping going from the turbos to the intake is so incredibly long. I just can't see the drivability with this setup to be good for a daily driver.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 11:43 AM | #5 | |
Lieutenant
37
Rep 471
Posts |
Quote:
my first instinct says tons of lag.... regardless of how well it works or not.. it seems like it would be a tough sell... (just look at the psi problem with the intercooler...getting people to understand that) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 12:04 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
11
Rep 420
Posts |
I always wonder with these kind of turbo setups if fast cooling would be a problem. I know a little about metal and i know if it gets really hot and the all of the sudden you throw water on it it could seize. Wouldn't this be the case with a turbo setup like this??
Again i don't know anything about turbos so please inform me. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 12:09 PM | #7 |
Brigadier General
125
Rep 3,004
Posts |
Seems like too much going on...I feel for the most part, Euro Enthusiasts prefer a more integrated approach to upgrading, especially when the cars are newer.
I don't see this selling well in this crowd. Let's leave the jerry rigging mods to domestic tuners |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 12:18 PM | #9 |
Brigadier General
218
Rep 4,726
Posts |
Um, have you even done any recon? Where do you plan on running the charge piping to the intake? There's barely any room. It works on those cars because they have large engine bays and space between the fender an body, this car does not.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 12:26 PM | #10 |
Moderator
132
Rep 6,775
Posts
Drives: TiAg E92 335
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
As Mr.5 pointed out, my first thought was about how much charge piping you need to run back to the front of the car. I actually had that discussion with a shop owner a few months back when he was installing a twin turbo setup on a customer's C6, and he said that lag wasn't really an issue at all, and since there was clearance for the piping it was a good setup. I've never had a setup like that before so I can't comment on it, but I would think that it would induce a hell of a lot of lag. Maybe that isn't an issue on a 6.0L V8, but don't you think it would be noticeable on our cars?
__________________
-Michael.
Berlina Black S2000 CR is now in the garage l 19" Rial Daytona Race l KW V2 l Eisenhaus Race Exhaust l |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 12:47 PM | #11 |
Captain
18
Rep 739
Posts |
Eh, I'm not much of a remote-mount turbos either. From what I understand, the hot side needs to be adjusted for being too far away from the runners. It could be a good system if designed right, but I don't see the point in 335i.
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold..... |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 01:09 PM | #13 |
Captain
15
Rep 645
Posts |
If you look at the round trip path the air going to the turbo takes - down and back the full length of the car 3 times - there is simply no way get the responsivity of a traditional turbo system. Any heat benefit you get from remote mounting the turbos is overshadowed by the inefficiency of the air routing. You're probably losing a lot of exhaust gas energy.
And the guy may have some unique pressure capture system, but that's a kludge to overcome a very fundamental flaw with this architecture.
__________________
2013 Audi S6, Ibis White
2008 E90 M3, Jerez Black, Black Nappa, Brushed Aluminium, 6-speed, Premium, Tech, Cold Weather *sold* |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 01:17 PM | #14 |
Captain
18
Rep 739
Posts |
^ remote mount set up has smaller turbine housing typically.
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold..... |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 01:41 PM | #16 |
Major
36
Rep 1,467
Posts |
Where are you suggesting to relocate?
In the picture it's a rear bumper... But could you be suggesting something like : in front of front-left wheel, behind the screen? Or up in front of where the air box is now? edit : if you re-locate to elsewhere in the engine bay, I imagine it'd be fine... -scheherazade |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 03:37 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant
27
Rep 569
Posts |
I have never seen the turbos in my car so I don't really care where they are located as long as this will make more power. That's the point of an upgrade... lag will always be presant...
__________________
N55
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 03:53 PM | #18 |
First Lieutenant
31
Rep 307
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 04:05 PM | #19 |
Lieutenant Colonel
95
Rep 1,659
Posts |
my friend had the sts setup on his 05 gto.
100% stock motor, larger injectors, new fuel pump, 8.5psi. 505whp, 550wtq...... you gotta love 6 liter engines on boost but no way i would ever consider running a setup like this on my 335. when you already have a 400hp 6 liter you aren't too concerned about lag - when you have a 45k+ bmw w/ an engine half the size i would expect a more traditional setup. also - remote setups are not any simpler to install on cars that are already FI - you add complexity w/ large amounts of plumbing, etc. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 04:16 PM | #20 |
Brigadier General
1013
Rep 3,157
Posts |
This would solve the real estate problems under the hood but most customers would shy from such a system simply because it is unconventional and they do not understand it.
However, if you have a remote mount kit that is just as capable as a top mount or some other type of relocation kit that keeps the turbo(s) under the hood and the remote mount is a large percentage cheaper...I think you can start making believers out of us!
__________________
Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread) Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread) INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2009, 05:14 PM | #21 |
First Lieutenant
46
Rep 324
Posts |
I saw a similar setup at the SD auto show on a new Hemi Challenger. He had them up closer though, near the bell housing. You could see them easily because of some mirrors he had underneath. My worry is what if I ran over a piece of trash that flew off some dude's truck heading to Tijuana? Or what if you run through a big puddle in the rain? It said the Challenger had 930 HP by the way...so it must work fairly well.
__________________
13 535i Msport
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|