E90Post
 


TNT Racewerks
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BMW E90/E92/E93 3-series General Forums > Regional Forums > USA - Rockies / Midwest > Turbochargers at high altitude



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-19-2009, 09:36 PM   #1
gofast!
Enlisted Member
United_States
11
Rep
33
Posts

Drives: 335xi
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA

iTrader: (10)

Turbochargers at high altitude

-

Last edited by gofast!; 01-30-2011 at 03:53 PM..
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2009, 12:29 AM   #2
Bimmer This
Major General
99
Rep
6,473
Posts

Drives: 2007 BMW 335i
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Westminster

iTrader: (3)

Because at high altitude, the air is "thinner" causing your turbos to work twice as hard to force more air through it. I think that's pretty much it!
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2009, 01:26 AM   #3
raceyBMW
king of the hills
raceyBMW's Avatar
92
Rep
2,915
Posts

Drives: 2011 M3 w/ESS55, 2001 540i/6
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arvada, CO

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2001 BMW 540i/6  [8.17]
1994 530i  [9.00]
2007 335i Coupe  [8.37]
The turbos at higher altitudes will increase boost pressure to compensate for the lower absolute pressure. So yes, technically, our turbos at our altitudes have to work harder to keep the same power as it would make at lower elevations. As far as longevity is concerned, I would assume BMW did lots of high altitude testing. They would have designed the turbos and engine for the most extreme conditions. So basically at sea level, the turbos would not be anywhere near their capacity...which is why it is so easy to raise boost with the piggybacks.

Everyone loses a little bit of power at our altitude, even turboed engines. No way will you find someone who runs a 1/4 mile up here match what someone can do at sea level. We just loose significantly less power than a naturally aspirated engine would since they have no way to overcome the "thinner" air. there are also other things to consider that the turbos working harder means that the oil/radiator fluid will run hotter and possibly increase air temps going into the engine. Hopefully the IC was designed to prevent this at our elevations, but who knows for sure.

And no, its not a stupid question at all, but you for sure would have been told to go search or whatever.
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2009, 11:50 AM   #4
335TrackAddict
Private
5
Rep
67
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Up in the hills

iTrader: (0)

Turbocharged vehicles lose power at altitude for various reasons.

A turbo doesn't care about psi. It only cares about pressure ratio. If you are at sea level (14.7psi ambient) and want to produce 14.7psi boost, the turbo workload is 2.0 pressure ratio. Right now, my altimeter watch is indicating 12.02psi ambient. For the same turbo to produce 14.7psi boost, the turbo workload is 2.22 pressure ratio ((ambient+boost) / (ambient). It is working harder to produce the same PSI.

The problem is that when turbos go higher and higher in the pressure ratio metric, they produce less additional PSI and more heat. Hot air = bad.

To compound the problem, the intercooler is less efficient. At altitude, there are less molecules moving across the intercooler fins. It is therefore less efficient at drawing heat away from the intake charge.

Some cars (Sti, I believe) have ECUs that are tuned to reduce boost at altitude. That reduces the stress on the turbo by making it work at the same pressure ratio.

BMW will up boost to compensate for lower ambients. However, it does not fully compensate. That implies to me that in stock form, the turbo has enough headroom to spin faster and compensate, to an extent, for the thinner air.

Throw in a tune and the turbo is working incredibly hard at altitude.
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2009, 12:12 PM   #5
F82_SID
Brigadier General
F82_SID's Avatar
No_Country
207
Rep
3,153
Posts

Drives: 2020 M2C 6mt HK Silver
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver, CO. USA

iTrader: (2)

So then would a blow off valve really help reduce some of the extra stress that is being put on our turbos?
__________________
2011/E92/M3/MR/BB/ZCV/ZP2/EDC/2MT
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2009, 03:51 PM   #6
forza1976
Major General
forza1976's Avatar
United_States
3395
Rep
6,587
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 49417 and 60610

iTrader: (13)

Garage List
2022 BMW M3X  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by gofast! View Post

I think someone posted on here last week that a 335 would lose about 10% of its power here in CO. However, when shopping for cars last fall I looked at a few Audis and all three of the dealers pushed me towards the 2.0T engine because they said it loses no power at altitude and actually runs better than the 3.2 V6. I've heard this 0% loss statistic from a few others as well.
I think half of what the deal is saying here is reasonable as well. The 2.0T does seem to feel better at this altitude versus the 3.2. Due in part to much of what the other guys have stated as well.

However, the Audi is just as susceptible to power loss as the BMW due to the lack of oxygen we have and of course air pressure. He is of course attempting to sell you a car
Appreciate 0
      04-21-2009, 11:21 AM   #7
335TrackAddict
Private
5
Rep
67
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Up in the hills

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by E92_SID View Post
So then would a blow off valve really help reduce some of the extra stress that is being put on our turbos?
Not really. The stress is there when you are under load and producing boost.

The BOV just vents excess pressure when you get OFF throttle and no longer need boost. The stock diverter valves have worked fine for me for that purpose.
Appreciate 0
      04-22-2009, 04:29 PM   #8
raceyBMW
king of the hills
raceyBMW's Avatar
92
Rep
2,915
Posts

Drives: 2011 M3 w/ESS55, 2001 540i/6
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arvada, CO

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2001 BMW 540i/6  [8.17]
1994 530i  [9.00]
2007 335i Coupe  [8.37]
The only way to reduce stress on the turbos under load is for the turbos to not be working as hard.

Mods such as catless DPs and an upgraded IC will help the turbos have to not work so hard to achieve a the same manifold pressure.

Catless DPs reduce the backpressure on the exhaust side of the turbo, allowing it to spin more freely.

An upgraded IC with a lower pressure drop across the cooling bars/fins means there are less losses of pressure from the turbo to the manifold, so the same manifold pressure can be achieved with the turbos boosting less. Obviously the other benefit to an upgrade IC as well is cooler charge air temperatures...cooler denser air will always make more power in our cars...which also may have a benefit to the turbos since higher AFRs mean you can run more advanced timing and therefore less overall boost from the turbos is needed.

BTW, someone correct me if I am wrong on any of this, don't want any misinformation going around.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST