SR-Racing & PP-Performance F10 M5

[GhanemMBN]

The Blue M5 F10 Project car has been tested 2 days ago, and its holding the record for the Fastest M5.

Mods: PPP StageVIP Tune / Akrapovic Exhaust / BMC Filters / some secrets

Upgraded turbos have NOT been installed yet, they are sent out to germany for extra modification.
The car isnt ready yet, still waiting for MANY parts, but i wanted to share some numbers

0-60 / 2.0
0-100 / 3.6
100-200 / 6.7

WATCH IN HD...

Tuners, please if you have better results, dont post a picture, video please

0-100

100-200

I chose the same song for both videos because my friend Simon from MHR loves it

[Falcao]

Here we go again.

Why need to constantly mention MHR in your comments on Ttube
MHR posts theirs and let the people decide.

Post your results and let it stand on it's own merit.

[GhanemMBN]

Originally Posted by Falcao

Here we go again.

Why need to constantly mention MHR in your comments on Ttube
MHR posts theirs and let the people decide.

Post your results and let it stand on it's own merit.

They r our friends, and our only competitors

[Boss330]

Originally Posted by GhanemMBN

The Blue M5 F10 Project car has been tested 2 days ago, and its holding the record for the Fastest M5.

Mods: PPP StageVIP Tune / Akrapovic Exhaust / BMC Filters / some secrets

Upgraded turbos have NOT been installed yet, they are sent out to germany for extra modification.
The car isnt ready yet, still waiting for MANY parts, but i wanted to share some numbers

0-60 / 2.0
0-100 / 3.6
100-200 / 6.7

I chose the same song for both videos because my friend Simon from MHR loves it

Why not let the videos and results talk for themselves? Why do you have to talk bad about your competition?

Just look at the noise your comments about MHR creates, instead of just getting attention for your results... If you hadn't made those comments about MHR, we all would comment on the results instead of on your statements about others...

And, you now demand that all others post verifiable videos (quite interesting coming from someone who has the record in posting unverified claims previously to now demand that others don't do what you have done in the past...)

I would like to see the video of your claimed 2,5second run from 0-100:

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=0-100

You claimed that the car can do 0-100 1,1sec quicker than in the vids you posted today...

[GhanemMBN]

Why cant you guys understand that we are friends with MHR, we use to sit and talk for hours with Mr.Simon when he was here in Abu dhabi. We use some parts from MHR. But we have a friendly competition thats all. They can also comment and see their reply

[GhanemMBN]

Boss330: I dont know how we got this number last time, we tried amillion times, we couldn't! lol the best we got was 3.6

[GhanemMBN]

Where has AMS reached with their M5, they had 2 months of R&D and then Downpipes, where's the rest?

[Boss330]

Originally Posted by GhanemMBN

Why cant you guys understand that we are friends with MHR, we use to sit and talk for hours with Mr.Simon when he was here in Abu dhabi. We use some parts from MHR. But we have a friendly competition thats all. They can also comment and see their reply

It would be easier to understand if you didn't make all those negative comments all the time... (after all we don't know whether you talked with Franz Simon or not in the past. We just have to make up our mind based on your comments about MHR).

And MHR doesn't mention you or others in a negative way when they represent their stuff. So, it's just a one way street of negative comments...

As I said previously, if you just concentrated on posting the stuff about PP you would not take away so much focus from what you want to tell us... I'm sure that would serve both you and PP better

[Boss330]

Originally Posted by GhanemMBN

Where has AMS reached with their M5, they had 2 months of R&D and then Downpipes, where's the rest?

OK.

You posted this allmost 3 months ago:

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=0-100

And this 2 months ago:

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=0-100

Why not give others some time as well to post results etc? In the first link you clearly stated that videos would be released by April 1st. You have posted a video today (May 8th) that has very different 0-100 times than what you claimed then...

If you can be late with results, why start questioning other companies?

[GhanemMBN]

Originally Posted by Boss330

OK.

You posted this allmost 3 months ago:

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=0-100

And this 2 months ago:

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=0-100

Why not give others some time as well to post results etc? In the first link you clearly stated that videos would be released by April 1st. You have posted a video today (May 8th) that has very different 0-100 times than what you claimed then...

If you can be late with results, why start questioning other companies?

First of all, im not questioning any company, im asking where are they with their project, all respect to IND & AMS

2- I was on the phone with Simon one hour ago and all you see in the forums is friendly competition. Are there any companies getting like our results? Its just PPP and MHR. Whats the point of tuning and spending thousands of dollars if there is no competition? We're not the type that paint reflectors or grills or window tint and consider it as a modification. We go hard on the engine until it gives us the results that satisfy us, and btw, even though SR-Racing got the best results, they are not even 50% satisfied

3. We had some problems with the upgraded turbos so we sent them back to Germany and waiting for them to be back, thats why nothing was ready by the 1st of April.

[Boss330]

MHR has recorded a 100-200 time of 6,3 sec:



And Mbitious recorded a 6,5 sec time on a WET autobahn on his MH5 S

[GhanemMBN]

Originally Posted by Boss330

MHR has recorded a 100-200 time of 6,3 sec:

I can claim this is Stage VIP M5! 100-200 in 6.2...
BUT, is there proof? We want a video, just like i posted 2!
If you are going to go with MHR's 6.3, then you have to believe that this 6.2 is our car /
Simon: ill not take you for shisha if u dont post a video showing 6.3 / PPP are the record holders so far

[Boss330]

Originally Posted by GhanemMBN

Attachment 858786

I can claim this is Stage VIP M5! 100-200 in 6.2...
BUT, is there proof? We want a video, just like i posted 2!
If you are going to go with MHR's 6.3, then you have to believe that this 6.2 is our car /
Simon: ill not take you for shisha if u dont post a video showing 6.3 / PPP are the record holders so far

GhanemMBN: You have previously posted 0-100 in 2,5 seconds and expected us to believe that, based on a VBox picture!

Now you are telling us that no one else can post pictures, like you have done in the past???

And saying that MHR has posted a fake picture...

[GhanemMBN]

Originally Posted by Boss330

GhanemMBN: You have previously posted 0-100 in 2,5 seconds and expected us to believe that, based on a VBox picture!

Now you are telling us that no one else can post pictures, like you have done in the past???

And saying that MHR has posted a fake picture...

Im saying i want a video, i can post photos all day

[Boss330]

Originally Posted by GhanemMBN

Im saying i want a video, i can post photos all day

But you expected to be believed when you only posted pictures...

Whatever...

Enjoy the car

[RPiM5]

Wait what?! 0-60mph in only 2.0 seconds?! Am I reading this correctly?? Or is this kph??

On a rear wheel drive car? Did you guys put drag radials on it or something??

Edit: Ok nevermind, I figured out you guys all mean kph not mph. Still 0-100kph or 0-62mph in 3.6 seconds is still not that impressive when a stock F10 can do 0-60mph in 3.7 seconds with launch control. In the video I can't tell if you use Launch Control or not.

[stealth.pilot]

Originally Posted by RPiM5

Wait what?! 0-60mph in only 2.0 seconds?! Am I reading this correctly?? Or is this kph??

On a rear wheel drive car? Did you guys put drag radials on it or something??

Edit: Ok nevermind, I figured out you guys all mean kph not mph. Still 0-100kph or 0-62mph in 3.6 seconds is still not that impressive when a stock F10 can do 0-60mph in 3.7 seconds with launch control. In the video I can't tell if you use Launch Control or not.

Agree, but on the other hand I wouldn't expect a tune to improve 0-62mph times. These are traction limited with our cars. Our cars won't benefit from a tune untitled the DSC light stops flickering which is about 90mph. So this will help reduce the quarter mile, but not the launch itself.

Agreed with previous posters on the credibility of this source, he comes across as inconsistent, prone to hyperbole, and questionable when into comes to evidence.

[RPiM5]

Originally Posted by stealth.pilot

Agree, but on the other hand I wouldn't expect a tune to improve 0-62mph times. These are traction limited with our cars. Our cars won't benefit from a tune untitled the DSC light stops flickering which is about 90mph. So this will help reduce the quarter mile, but not the launch itself.

Agreed with previous posters on the credibility of this source, he comes across as inconsistent, prone to hyperbole, and questionable when into comes to evidence.

Hyperbole indeed.

[GhanemMBN]

Originally Posted by Boss330

But you expected to be believed when you only posted pictures...

Whatever...

Enjoy the car

Not my car, im just posting the progress

[GhanemMBN]

Originally Posted by RPiM5

Wait what?! 0-60mph in only 2.0 seconds?! Am I reading this correctly?? Or is this kph??

On a rear wheel drive car? Did you guys put drag radials on it or something??

Edit: Ok nevermind, I figured out you guys all mean kph not mph. Still 0-100kph or 0-62mph in 3.6 seconds is still not that impressive when a stock F10 can do 0-60mph in 3.7 seconds with launch control. In the video I can't tell if you use Launch Control or not.

First of all, i promise you here in M5post, if you achieved (video) better than our time, i will transfer 10,000 $ to you, or even 3.7 ! PROMISE I SWEAR.. lol

If it was launched, the rpm would go up to 3000 rpm then it will accelerate, so it wasnt launched

[GhanemMBN]

Originally Posted by stealth.pilot

Agree, but on the other hand I wouldn't expect a tune to improve 0-62mph times. These are traction limited with our cars. Our cars won't benefit from a tune untitled the DSC light stops flickering which is about 90mph. So this will help reduce the quarter mile, but not the launch itself.

Agreed with previous posters on the credibility of this source, he comes across as inconsistent, prone to hyperbole, and questionable when into comes to evidence.

Full power is when u turn off the traction, so whoever cant handle driving such a car just dont get one or otherwise get a 550 or 1-series. Another thing is if the car slips, get better tires although they are quiet expensive.
What about 100-200, the stock M5 isnt even close to 6.7, its in high 7s

[cidair]

My bone stock M5 does: 100-200 km/h 7.1s and 200-250 km/h 6.6s

Tested with VBOX at +8 deg C, 50% tank, 1 person, level surface autobahn.

Just to compare