|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
[Datalogs] PROede Rev 2.5 and DCI Setup [Resolved]
|
|
12-25-2013, 06:14 PM | #1 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
[Datalogs] PROede Rev 2.5 and DCI Setup [Resolved]
Original Thread: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=926184
Here are my new Datalogs, I ran all of the 20(E85)/80(9 Octane) fuel mix until the fuel tank was near empty (displayed "--.-- mls") then proceeded to fill the fuel tank with 91 octane until full/topped it off. Now we can get a proper baseline and see if and why my fuel trims are maxing out/as well as how my air/fuel ratios are doing. Also what my OL should be set to? I reset commands 12 to 4 in mode 3 from the command center at the gas station before starting the car back up... My mods are the following: PROcede with 7-29 Autotuning Maps and DCI running on only 91 Octane I ran DSC/DTC off, First Map 1 in 100% OL... then switched to Map 2 in 100% OL... and then opened up my "User Adjustable Parameters", adjusted the OL to 0% and then Datalogged two more runs... one in Map 2 and the other in Map 1. Hopefully this can provide enough information so we can sort all this out. Thank you!
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] Last edited by SINGH_; 01-02-2014 at 08:56 PM.. |
12-25-2013, 06:15 PM | #2 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
new to tuning:
what do i need to change?
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2013, 06:23 PM | #3 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
MAP 1 [100% OL]:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7M...it?usp=sharing MAP 2 [100% OL] https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7M...it?usp=sharing
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] Last edited by SINGH_; 01-02-2014 at 08:57 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2013, 07:17 PM | #4 |
Major General
456
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Any chance you can post those logs in datazap? You'll get far more eyes on with that format.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2013, 10:41 PM | #5 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Thank you for that suggestion! never knew such a website existed
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2013, 10:59 PM | #6 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
[dataZAP]
MAP 1 [100% OL]: http://datazap.me/u/simarjit/map-1-100-ol MAP 2 [100% OL] http://datazap.me/u/simarjit/map-2-100-ol
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] Last edited by SINGH_; 01-02-2014 at 08:58 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2013, 11:08 PM | #7 |
Major General
456
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Man...those aren't good brother, I won't sugar coat.
In all of those logs, your car is fighting itself trying to sort fueling. You are spiking WAY lean early on, AFRs approaching 17 are unacceptable on pump gas, regardless of this being DI. Trims peg quickly and stay pegged, so the DME is adding in as much fuel as is possible (likely to compensate for the serious lean condition early on). Then your AFR nose dives into the 11s- that in and of itself is all well and good but you shouldn't be seeing anywhere near that drastic a change in a single gear pull. So these are pump gas maps, with 91 octane? My knowledge of the PROcede is elementary, so I don't want to give you poor advice. Do you have a means of reviewing the fuel scalars for this map? Get in touch with Vishnu, your car is not happy.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII Last edited by 135Pats; 12-25-2013 at 11:15 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2013, 11:40 PM | #8 | |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
i'm glad you didn't sugar coat it! do you have any ideas what could be causing this? i have contacted vishnu, they are only an hour or so drive away from me. i'm hoping they can help me sort this. i have no idea how to access fuel scalars for this map. what do you think could be causing this? the programming itself? is my car hitting dangerous air/fuel ratios?
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2013, 11:45 PM | #9 | |
Major General
456
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Quote:
As to the cause...man it could be so many things. The DME's response to the lean condition makes sense, you can see fuel trims peg very quickly after the lean condition, and then AFRs settle to a far more acceptable 11-12 ratio. I'm 100% guessing here, but it's likely something to do with the way the PROcede is communicating to the car. Somewhere along the line, fueling targets are being jumbled. This doesn't seem like a hardware issue to me. Hence why I asked about the fuel scalars for these maps, I simply don't know what the PROcede targets. You are running piggyback only which fundamentally limits the amount of fuel you can provide down low, but that is no reason to see the issues we're seeing here. Get in touch with Shiv over the phone or in person and get this sorted.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2013, 11:47 PM | #10 |
Major General
456
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Honestly for the time being I would have the PROcede running passive, so stock tables to the greatest extent possible. Don't risk melting something over what could be as simple as a firmware revision, or a table that needs simple modification. I'm sure Shiv can get this handled in short order.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 12:43 AM | #11 |
Captain
51
Rep 923
Posts |
The settings you are running for the 7-29 maps are wrong. I would honestly update the Procede to the newer aggressive maps if you have a Rev2.5 or Rev3. The fueling is much better. If you wish to continue running the 7-29 maps (or have an older Rev2), you should reload the firmware, then load the map and leave everything default. Its not ideal for the car to make such a drastic changes from 100% OL to 0%. The DME has to adapt to each change in the settings and especially right after you reset all the adaptations. Not trying to be a dick, but if you don't understand what those settings do, be careful adjusting them aimlessly. The OL fueling is adjustable from 0% to 100% not just 0 or 100. For the 7-29 maps with your mods, you should be around 70-85% on the OL fueling if I was guessing. You will need to enable the autotuning by changing the number next to Map1 from a "1" to a "2" You only need to run Map 1. On those maps, Map 2 was for race gas or if you run meth. With the 7-29 maps, it was common for the AFR to be lean on boost onset then settle at the appropriate AFR.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 08:12 AM | #12 | |
Private First Class
26
Rep 153
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 09:11 AM | #13 |
Major General
456
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Good answer @jdbretz, all sounds right to me but again i'm on pretty general terms when it comes to the PROcede. Sounds like a simple firmware update is needed for OP.
Lean spikes as boost comes on are one thing...but IMO pump gas maps leaning out to 17 for a decent duration of time is lazy tuning, or a piggyback that simply cannot provide enough fuel down low. I suppose this is why so many folks stack with OFT now a days to sort that part of it.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 09:39 AM | #14 | |
Captain
51
Rep 923
Posts |
Quote:
The OP's fuel trims on the other hand are somewhat concerning. I would like to see some logs with a fresh firmware install (preferably with the newer aggressive maps), default settings, and reloading the maps. This will give a good baseline to troubleshoot off of. There were many cars that had problems when 100% OL was selected, but functioned fine on a lower setting. Your trims should not be maxing out at such a relatively low boost pressure, but there were several people I remember reading about that had to try several different maps before finding one their car agreed with. Before taking any logs though, be sure and give the car a little time to adapt. 3 3rd gear to redline WOT pulls with adequate cool down between should let the car adapt and then we will have a better idea of what is going on. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 09:48 AM | #15 |
Major General
456
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Hadn't considered lean spool behavior in terms of how it interacts (or more accurately, how it doesn't interact) with piggys that hijack the CAN. Good point for sure. I don't think OP seriously risks melting anything, but coming from flash only world, that type of lean spike just looks bizarre to me.
Yea as much as anything OP needs to revise the firmware, pick a map, and let the adaptations take place. The car is likely baffled by the frequency of map changes.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 06:34 PM | #16 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Thank you guys! it really means alot. I am also starting to think its firmware issues... it seems like my parameters change by themselves. When i installed the firmware maps, it was giving some issues. Disconnected me a few times while updating maps/firmware. Not sure that caused issues... my maps were on autotuning enabled... yet when i took the screenshot to upload they're off. odd. also my OL was set to 0% by the map... before i adjusted anything.
this morning i updated to the aggressive maps as jdbretz suggest. ive been driving it around today, i will be able to do some runs tonight and get you guys some new dataZap logs tonight after work. i just updated the firmware, then installed the 6AT Stage 1 map... did not touch anything after that. did i install the correct stage? (mods: dci, procede 2.5, and a vrsf charge pipe/tial bov...)
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 09:44 PM | #17 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Aggressive Firmware/Maps
NEW DATALOGS:
[Aggressive 9-10] Map 1 [Run 1]: http://datazap.me/u/simarjit/aggress...10-map-1-run-1 [Aggressive 9-10] Map 1 [Run 2]: http://datazap.me/u/simarjit/aggress...10-map-1-run-2
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 09:54 PM | #18 |
Major General
456
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Those are still rough. Still seeing the same fuel issue- a big ole lean spike on spool/approaching peak boost, followed by pegged trims as the DME attempts to compensate and richen things up.
You have a big, big timing drop especially in that first log. These are so messy, I really think it's a tuning or software issue. If it's hardware, I don't know where to begin. The boost curve is more or less fine looking, but on the fuel side your car is seriously unhappy.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 11:35 PM | #19 | |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
I don't know what it could be :/ hopefully vishnu can help on this... i can't think of anything i could do to help the situation. How are my AF ratios? Is the new tune at least safe even if it isn't performing well? That is my biggest concern
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-26-2013, 11:45 PM | #20 |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Can anyone send me a datalog/datazap for a ideal procede tune? so I know what my graphs should be looking like.
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
12-27-2013, 12:09 AM | #21 |
Colonel
77
Rep 2,114
Posts |
Looking at both runs on the aggressive, your AFR is pegging 17-20 around 4400-4900 rpm on run #1 and you aren't even at peak boost. Its a similar but not quite as scary story with run #2.
Normally, spikes as jdbretz said, aren't a cause for concern as they tend to happen for instance when letting off the throttle (IE: Shifting gears). Factoring in the fuel trims is where it gets interesting. Based on the readings in both runs and the suggestions posted between your previous thread and this one, I'd like to offer a different suggestion. Check your connections on the chargepipe, intakes, bov, etc and while you're in there clean the MAF. I might be way off base here but if you don't have a vacuum leak anywhere then I suspect the MAF is getting false readings which is in turn making the car try to correct them itself. If nothing else even if I'm wrong, it will give you an opportunity to confirm it isn't a hardware related issue.
__________________
E92 '08 335Xi 6AT - Cobb AP3 Tuned by MAC Autosport, Original Prototype Xi DOCRace 6266 Single Turbo Swap, VRSF CP w/Synapse BOV, VRSF 7" FMIC, BMS Cowl, H&R Coilovers, Renn Motorsport RS-51's, Stoptech Stage 2 Slotted, xHP Stage 3, Earl's Racing Oil Cooler, Turner Boost Gauge, M3 Lip Spoiler.
Standing Mile Record Holder for Xi over a mile high: 168.2MPH @ 5512'; The Colorado Mile hosted by The US Mile. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-27-2013, 12:30 AM | #22 | |
N54 E92
51
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|