|
|
|
02-03-2016, 03:08 AM | #1 |
Major
327
Rep 960
Posts |
Camber plates and NVH
Trying to decide on camber plate options for a 135i e82 narrowed it down to two options:
Dinan plates with M3 arms - Guessing this will net me around -2deg camber or Vorshlag camber plates - -2.5ish deg camber With the vorshlag plates I get more camber plus adjustability (plus the option for m3 arms later) however there is supposedly more NVH. Interested on people's thoughts (that have the vorshlag plates installed) do they noticeably increase NVH? Car is mainly road driven with the intention for the occasional track day. |
02-03-2016, 09:00 AM | #2 | |
Brigadier General
827
Rep 3,856
Posts |
Quote:
It's worth it to keep things simple where you can; if you can get -2 degrees camber with fixed parts then I'd take any day over -2 with adjustable parts (more parts is more problems). Do you think your driving skills will require more than -2 at the track? That's a reason to go adjustable. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-03-2016, 03:16 PM | #3 |
Supreme Allied Commander
3845
Rep 54,376
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
Lowered or not lowered? M3 arms plus the alignment pin removal will give you a healthy amount of camber.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-03-2016, 03:40 PM | #4 | |
Major
327
Rep 960
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-03-2016, 05:43 PM | #7 |
Motorsports Engineer
46
Rep 95
Posts |
Adding the Vorshlag camber plates adds about the same NVH as going to a +1 tire fitment. I should know. I've done enough test drives in cars before and after.
__________________
Jason McDaniel at Vorshlag
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-03-2016, 08:15 PM | #8 |
!
698
Rep 3,267
Posts
Drives: 2010 128i
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Anacortes, WA
|
Dinan plates & M3 LCA's netted me -1.8 degrees. Switched to Ground Control "street" adjustable plates and am now at -2.7 degrees. I think the additional negative camber really helps with turn in, but I have a bunch of other mods besides. And I wouldn't necessarily spend the time/money unless you have plans to track or AX the car.
NVH isn't really an issue with the GC street plates, as they're designed for dual-duty cars.
__________________
____________________________ |
Appreciate
0
|
02-03-2016, 08:28 PM | #9 |
Слава Украине!
2317
Rep 2,441
Posts |
With Spec-R springs, M3 lcas and Dinan camber plates I'm at -2.3 degrees.
__________________
Last edited by Suprgnat; 02-03-2016 at 08:29 PM.. Reason: I hate autocorrect |
Appreciate
0
|
02-03-2016, 08:38 PM | #10 |
Major
327
Rep 960
Posts |
how is tyre wear on the street with that much camber?
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-03-2016, 09:18 PM | #11 |
Слава Украине!
2317
Rep 2,441
Posts |
Perfectly even.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-05-2016, 11:20 AM | #12 | |
Supreme Allied Commander
3845
Rep 54,376
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
Quote:
Camber plates all add some NVH, but it's expected. A fully adjustable camber plate is the way to go if you are looking for additional camber. Camber plates also allow you to square up the car in the event that you can't get the LH and RH camber settings to match. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-05-2016, 04:53 PM | #13 | ||
Major
327
Rep 960
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2016, 02:03 PM | #14 |
Brigadier General
827
Rep 3,856
Posts |
Well compared to the race plates yea. I actually just made the switch from the GC race plates (which are now for sale) to their street plates, all else remaining the same) and it was a nice decrease in overall road noise. Reason being is that the street plates eliminate the spherical bearing that the race plates have and instead use polyurethane. In terms of steering and all other ways they feel the exact same.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2016, 02:22 PM | #15 |
Major General
4338
Rep 6,196
Posts |
Just curious, are you adding camber to increase handling, or doing it for more tire clearance?
Adding the M3 arms with increase camber, but will actually make tire clearance worse at the fender. And for another data point, I have M3 front arms and Dinan plates and sitting at -2.3 left and right, stock springs. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2016, 03:31 PM | #16 | |
Major
327
Rep 960
Posts |
Quote:
MightyMouseTech handling. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2016, 04:03 PM | #17 |
Brigadier General
827
Rep 3,856
Posts |
Well there's no caster adjustment, and not as much camber adjustment but I'm at -2 ish now and I should be able to achieve -2.5 which is enough for me as I daily my car.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2016, 04:25 PM | #19 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 128
Posts |
Fixed dinan plates and m3 control arms, pin removal and slotted strut towers. -2.5.
Stock springs. Will be installing coil overs when back home in a month and there looks like there might be enough room to get to -3 on all fixed parts with a few extra mm of slotting. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2016, 05:36 PM | #20 |
Colonel
232
Rep 2,643
Posts |
I used Ground control street plates for the last 2 years. IMO, they add noticeable NVH compared to the OE rubber mounts. I think its preferable to keep the stock rubber mounts if you are concerned about NVH when driving on typical Australian roads. The M3 arms are a good upgrade for both street driving and also for track. The give some negative camber and improved steering feel without much change in NVH.
If you are just getting started with track driving, you don't need camber plates right away. However once you have done 1 or 2 track days then you will probably want to get them. The main issue is the outside shoulder of your front tires will get destroyed if you don't have the correct amount of front camber. If you decide to upgrade shocks and struts, then that that is the ideal time to have the camber plates installed. |
Appreciate
1
|
02-08-2016, 06:09 PM | #21 |
Brigadier General
827
Rep 3,856
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|