|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-17-2008, 07:42 PM | #2 |
My favorite sign.
169
Rep 4,333
Posts |
Dunno...KW seems to have more followers than TCK's Konis.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2008, 08:14 AM | #4 |
First Lieutenant
29
Rep 339
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2008, 05:10 AM | #5 |
Major
95
Rep 1,269
Posts |
TCK coilovers can go pretty low too. The front can go pretty low already, and you can get short rear springs.
If ride comfort's an issue, go with TCK 400F/400R springs. More comfortable than KW V3 and handle better too (I've had both TCK & KW V3). TCK coilovers are also much lighter than KW V3's.
__________________
2019 Porsche 911 4 GTS
2016 BMW M3 2008 BMW Z4M coupe |
Appreciate
0
|
08-29-2008, 07:53 AM | #6 | |
Captain
433
Rep 753
Posts |
Quote:
Both setups should handle better than stock and allow you to "drop" the car if you so choose. That being said, below are some technical facts: - KWs use a progressive front spring while the TCKs use linear - You can choose springs rates for the TCKs which is great for optimizing the handling/ride quality - KWs have INOX steel shock bodies (great for NE winters and rain). Not sure if the TCKs are steel as well. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|